Journal of irreproducible results pdf

Journal of irreproducible results pdf
The Journal of Irreproducible Results – Selected Papers. A Selection of superb and irreproducible re by George Scherr (1981-08-02) A Selection of superb and irreproducible …
Get this from a library! Journal of irreproducible results : Jir : official journal of the Society for Basic Irreproducible Research.. [Society for Basic Irreproducible Research.;]
Journal of Irreproducible Results II has 9 ratings and 0 reviews. When Volume I of this Journal was published, many readers were unable to determine if i…
A recipe for irreproducible results 2 1. Design a protocol to extract the true value from a noisy measurement. The protocol is designed to be good whenever a true value exists (and is stationary).
A study published in the Journal of Irreproducible Results concluded that a 21-hour school day is optimal, with continuous classes and no breaks, except for two breaks for meals and one lavatory visit.
Journal of Irreproducible Results II. Scerr, George. Published by
mitted to any scientifi c journal. Irreproducible results: a response to Thomson Scientifi c Mike Rossner , 1 Heather Van Epps , 2 and Emma Hill 3 1Executive Director, The Rockefeller University Press 2Executive Editor, The Journal of Experimental Medicine 3Executive
journal of irreproducible results, journal of irreproducible results butterfly, journal of irreproducible results selected papers, journal of irreproducible results national geographic, journal of irreproducible results butterfly hurricane, best of the journal of irreproducible results improbable investigations & unfounded findings, the best of
28/12/2018 · journal of irreproducible results Cyber-attack hits US newspaper deliveries: Report The report said it could not provide firm numbers on how many subscribers were impacted but a majority of LA Times customers received their papers Saturday morning, albeit several hours late.
Journal of Irreproducible Results October 3, 2013 1:31 PM Subscribe. On 4 July, good news arrived in the inbox of Ocorrafoo Cobange, a biologist at the Wassee Institute of Medicine in Asmara. It was the official letter of acceptance for a paper he had submitted 2 months earlier to the Journal of Natural Pharmaceuticals, describing the anticancer properties of a chemical that Cobange had

18/02/2008 · In essence, Thomson Scientific is saying that they cannot repeat the experiment, which would be grounds for rejection of a manuscript submitted to any scientific journal. Thomson Scientific argues that we did not inform them of the methodologies we would apply to the data when we purchased it.
The results of this exploration were later applied to determining exactly what an arm and a leg were worth. Frips soon became a prominent member of her department. She showed signs of a promising career, but slowly her projects became more and more dangerous.
This journal (JDAR) has not had a problem with irreproducible results, but it is not a problem that can be ignored. I write this letter because this is a significant issue that is not going away. Correcting this problem can only be a good thing. This journal will support efforts to improve reproducibility, and will judiciously follow recommendations made by responsible groups. It seems
The last, and most concerning, explanation for irreproducible results is scientific fraud. The precise prevalence of fraud in publications is not known, of course; however, a recent study by Fanelli 10 raises concerning issues about its estimates.

Amazon.com journal of irreproducible results

https://youtube.com/watch?v=NGEv8YmG1ec


(PDF) Irreproducible Results A Response to Thomson Scientific

The Journal of Irreproducible Results. This project does not qualify for a listing with Duotrope. Publication details and submission statistics for this project are not available through our site. Reason: They do not have an up-to-date official website. About our Listing Criteria Just as publications have guidelines for submission, so too does Duotrope have Criteria for Listings for any
PDF Thomson Scientific has posted a response (1) to our editorial on the reliability of their impact factor data (2). In it, they claim that our interpretation of the communication between our

The Journal of Irreproducible Results Darren Goossens

Opinion Letter Stephen Krashen Too harsh to schedule

Journal of irreproducible results Jir official journal


Irreproducible Experimental Results Circulation

https://youtube.com/watch?v=wgSZA3NPpBs

Irreproducible Results Europe PMC Article – Europe PMC


Journal of Irreproducible Results II by George H. Scherr

The Journal of Irreproducible Results Duotrope

https://youtube.com/watch?v=NGFO0kdbZmk

Journal of Irreproducible Results Infogalactic the

A recipe for irreproducible results arXiv

Journal of Irreproducible Results MetaFilter


Irreproducible results a response to Thomson Scientifi c

9780760704226 Journal of Irreproducible Results II

4 thoughts on “Journal of irreproducible results pdf”

  1. PDF Thomson Scientific has posted a response (1) to our editorial on the reliability of their impact factor data (2). In it, they claim that our interpretation of the communication between our

    (PDF) Irreproducible Results A Response to Thomson Scientific

  2. journal of irreproducible results, journal of irreproducible results butterfly, journal of irreproducible results selected papers, journal of irreproducible results national geographic, journal of irreproducible results butterfly hurricane, best of the journal of irreproducible results improbable investigations & unfounded findings, the best of

    Amazon.com journal of irreproducible results
    Opinion Letter Stephen Krashen Too harsh to schedule
    Journal of Irreproducible Results II by George H. Scherr

  3. 18/02/2008 · In essence, Thomson Scientific is saying that they cannot repeat the experiment, which would be grounds for rejection of a manuscript submitted to any scientific journal. Thomson Scientific argues that we did not inform them of the methodologies we would apply to the data when we purchased it.

    The Journal of Irreproducible Results Duotrope
    Hello) journal of irreproducible results

  4. 18/02/2008 · In essence, Thomson Scientific is saying that they cannot repeat the experiment, which would be grounds for rejection of a manuscript submitted to any scientific journal. Thomson Scientific argues that we did not inform them of the methodologies we would apply to the data when we purchased it.

    Journal of Irreproducible Results II by George H. Scherr

Comments are closed.

Related Post